Lab 11
|
Objectives: |
Reading: |
|
1. Bacteria of Oral Cavity and Respiratory Tract |
1. Tortora, pages 397; 652; 659-662; 684 |
|
2. Demonstration of Viral Cultures |
2. P: pages 73; 94-95; L: pages 38; 70 |
|
3. Rectal Specimens |
Normal
Skin Flora
Complete skin isolates
lab:
1.
Review your MSA and
blood culture subcultures.
2.
If you suspect S.
aureus, perform a coagulase test:
a.
Obtain test tube
containing a measured 0.5 ml of
rabbit plasma.
b.
Using a sterilized
inoculating loop, place a colony (or more) into this broth.
c.
Incubate the test tube
at 35-37 degrees.
d.
At four hours examine
for the presence of a clot (positive) and then re examine again at 24 hour if
negative at 4 hours. (Lab assistants will remove the broth at 24 hours and
refrigerate).
3.
MSA and blood culture
subcultures are to be disposed of in tubs at this time.
Microorganisms
of the Oral Cavity

A
great diversity of organisms is found within the oral cavity.
Here,
at the entrance to both the digestive and respiratory systems, the environment
is warm, moist, and nutrient-rich—-perfect for even the most fastidious of
organisms. Below
is a list of the predominant flora of the oral cavity. Most of these organisms are
bacterial. You should be familiar
with the major organisms and their role in oral disease. Table
of the Microorganisms of the Oral Cavity
Microorganism Gram
Reaction Oxygen
Needs Physiologic
Traits Association
with Disease Streptococcus
salivarius Positive Facultative
anaerobe Coccus;
a
and
g
hemolysis;
found on tongue surface; acid & levan production Infectious
endocarditis Streptococcus
sanguis Positive Facultative
anaerobe Coccus;
acid production Plaque
flora; pulp infection; infectious endocarditis Streptococcus
mutans Positive Facultative
anaerobe Coccus;
mostly on teeth; acid, levan, & dextran
production Infectious
endocarditis Lactobacillus
acidophilus Positive Facultative
anaerobe Bacillus;
acid tolerant; acid production Plaque,
caries Lactobacillus
casei Positive Facultative
anaerobe Bacillus;
acid tolerant; acid production Plaque,
caries Neisseria
species Negative Aerobe Diplococcus;
oxidase positive Normal
flora Actinomyces
viscosus Positive Anaerobe Bacillus;
proteolytic; acid production Actinomycosis;
gingivitis Actinomyces
naeslundi Positive
Anaerobe Bacillus;
mineralization; acid production Periodontitis,
caries Bacteroides
melanogenicus Negative Anaerobe Bacillus;
found in gingival pockets Periodontitis;
acute necrotizing ulcerative gingivitis (ANUG); subgingival
plaque Bacteroides
oralis Negative Anaerobe Bacillus;
found in gingival pockets Periodontitis;
ANUG; subgingival plaque Bacteroides
forsythus Negative Anaerobe Bacillus;
found in gingival pockets Periodontitis;
ANUG; subgingival plaque Bacteroides
gingivalis Negative Anaerobe Bacillus;
found in gingival pockets Periodontitis;
ANUG; subgingival plaque Fusobacterium
nucleatum Negative Anaerobe Acid
production; toothpick-shaped rod Chronic
marginal periodontitis Eikenella
corrodens Negative Facultative
anaerobe Bacillus;
colonies pit the agar Systemic
infection from bites or injury leading to cellulitis and
arthritis Treponema
denticola Not
performed Anaerobe Spriochete;
nutritionally fastidious ANUG Treponema
vincenti Not
performed Anaerobe Spirochete;
nutritionally fastidious ANUG Corynebacterium
species Positive Variable Bacillus;
normal flora Pulp
and root canal infection Porphyromonas
gingivalis Negative
Anaerobe Bacillus Periodontitis Prevotella
intermedia Negative Anaerobe Bacillus Predominant
cause of ANUG Actinobacillus
actinomycetemcomitans Negative Facultative
anaerobe Bacillus;
oxidase positive Juvenile
periodontitis Candida
albicans Positve Yeast Normal
flora Thrush;
denture stomatitis; root canal
infection The
respiratory system can be divided into the upper and lower respiratory
systems. The
upper respiratory system contains ·
the
nose and its associated structures, which include ducts from the sinuses and
nasolacrimal ducts from the tear-forming apparatus that empty into the nasal
cavity ·
the
pharynx (throat) and its associated structures, which include the middle ear and
the eustachian tubes, and ·
the
oral cavity, which contains the tongue. The
lower respiratory system contains ·
the
larynx, ·
the
trachea, ·
the
bronchial tubes, and ·
the
alveoli. The
lower respiratory system is essentially sterile, although the trachea may
contain a few bacteria. The upper
respiratory system, on the other hand, is home to many normal flora, including
some that are potentially pathogenic, given the right
circumstances. To
a certain degree, the microorganisms of the upper respiratory system are a
reflection of the microbiota of the skin.
For example, both Staphylococcus
aureus
and Staphylococcus
epidermidis
can be recovered from nasopharyngeal cultures. Some organisms are more frequently found
among certain age groups than others.
For example, Group A beta hemolytic Streptococcus
is often carried by school age children.
Below is a list of some of the bacteria that can be isolated as normal
flora from upper respiratory tract cultures: ·
Moraxella
species ·
Neisseria
species ·
S.
epidermidis The
following organisms are only considered normal flora if present in very small
numbers. If present in large
numbers, or if found in a pure culture, they are considered
pathogenic: ·
S. aureus
·
Haemophilus
influenzae ·
Other
gram negative bacilli Finally,
below are examples of organisms that are generally always considered
pathogenic: ·
Group
A, beta hemolytic Streptococcus
·
Streptococcus
pneumoniae In
today’s lab, we will compare your oral and respiratory cultures to known
cultures of some common flora of the oral and upper respiratory areas. Use the table on the next page to
organize your pattern-recognition abilities and then to compare your isolates
with the knowns.
Remember,
‘colony configuration’ can include types of blood agar hemolysis, color of the
colony, texture of the colony—in short, its physical appearance to your
discerning eye. ‘Colony margins’
include descriptive terms such as ‘smooth,’ ‘scalloped,’ ‘irregular,’ and
‘spreading.’ ‘Colony elevation’ is
either ‘flat,’ ‘raised,’ or ‘grows below the agar line.’
Bacterial Colony Colony
Configuration Colony Margins Colony
Elevation Streptococcus
sanguis Streptococcus
pneumoniae Streptococcus
pyogenes Streptococcus
agalactiae S.
epidermidis S.
aureus Now,
examine the blood agar plates of your oral samples from last week. 1.
Compare
the aerobic plate to the anaerobic plate. a.
Is there
any difference in growth patterns? b.
Did the
same organisms grow on both plates? c.
What do
these two plates tell you about the organisms’ oxygen requirements? 2.
How many
different colony types can you distinguish? 3.
How do
your isolates compare to the above colony morphologies? 4.
Are your
cultures pure or mixed? 5.
Perform
a Gram stain of one oral colony of your choice (see next page for
instructions). Next,
examine the blood agar plate of your respiratory sample from last week. You will also want to refer to the
Dichotomous Schemes below. Gram
Negative/Positive Dichotomous Schemes Gram
Stain
Materials: Inoculating loop Glass slide Slide holder Glass marking pen Bunsen burner Flint lighter Bibulous paper Label your slide, if you plan on keeping it. Place a small drop of .85% saline on the slide. Sterilize your inoculating loop and select a colony. Pick it up and mix it with the
saline. Allow the saline/colony solution to dry fully. Heat fix it. Gram stain it: Crystal violet, one minute. Rinse with water. Iodine, one minute. Rinse with water. Alcohol, until runoff is clear OR 20 seconds, whichever is shorter.
Rinse with water. Saffranin, one minute. Rinse with
water. Blot dry, using bibulous paper. Coarse focus on 10x; fine focus, using oil, on 100
x. Oxidase
Test To perform the oxidase test: Place an oxidase strip on a paper towel. Using a sterile inoculating needle, scrape part of your bacterial
colony onto the oxidase strip. A blue/dark purple color change is
positive. Catalase
Test To perform a catalase test, Place a drop of hydrogen peroxide on a clean glass
slide. Using a sterile inoculating needle, mix a selected colony with the
peroxide. The presence of bubbles of oxygen is indicative of a positive
reaction. Bacitracin Bacitracin is an antimicrobial.
That means it is a substance produced by a bacterium (in this case, by
Bacillus subtilis) that inhibits other bacteria’s cell wall synthesis and
disrupts their membrane structure.
Disks impregnated with bacitracin are placed on blood agar plates
containing Streptococcus. After
incubation, the following patterns can be observed: Group
A Streptococcus Sensitive Group
B Streptococcus Resistant Groups
C, F, G Streptococcus Resistant The main
purpose of this test is to presumptively identify Group A Streptococcus.
Optochin
This test is used to presumptively differentiate Streptococcus
pneumoniae from other alpha hemolytic Streptococci. Because S. pneumoniae is
susceptible to extremely small concentrations of the antibiotic, optochin
(unlike the other Streptococcus, which are susceptible only to larger
amounts), a disk containing minute amounts of optochin is placed on a blood agar
plate with presumptive S. pneumoniae. After incubation, if there is a zone of
inhibition that indicates susceptibility to optochin, S. pneumoniae are
presumptively identified. Rectal
Samples A sterile swab of the rectal area will be made in the
bathroom. Use the swab (in the bathroom) to streak the upper eighth of the
following plates: MacConkey’s PEA Hektoen Blood agar BRING THE SWAB BACK TO THE LAB FOR DISPOSAL. At your lab station, use a sterile loop to streak for
isolation. These plates will be examined next week. Take
Out Food for the Brain: Although much attention is given to bacterial causes of respiratory tract
diseases, the truth is that around 90% of acute upper respiratory infections and
almost half of lower respiratory infections are caused by viruses. One such virus is a Paramyxovirus called
“respiratory syncitial virus (RSV),” named for the characteristic
multi-nucleated syncitia that are formed when it grows in cell cultures. A syncitium is a group of cells that
have fused together. Respiratory syncitial virus is the primary cause of viral respiratory
disease in infants. It infects and
multiplies within the epithelial cells of the upper respiratory tract, generally
producing a mild, even unnoticeable illness. However, in a certain number of infants,
it will subsequently spread into the lower respiratory tract, where it can wreak
havoc. Here, bronchitis, croup, and
pneumonia can develop; symptoms are so severe that death can occur rapidly. RSV is highly contagious and is known
for sweeping through hospital nurseries. It kills 4500 infants each year in the
United States and has been associated with Sudden Infant Death Syndrome (SIDS)
and the development of asthma in its survivors. Because viral identification methods are time-consuming and expensive,
the reported figures probably underestimate the true number of cases. Viruses, unlike bacteria, do not grow on
artificial media such as agar. They
require living cells in which to reproduce. And, because the
identification of a viral etiologic cause of disease is often academic (it
generally makes no difference as far as therapeutic interventions go), patients
are presumptively diagnosed with viral infections after bacterial causes have
been ruled out. Koch’s postulates
do not prevail here! To conclusively identify a virus such as RSV, a number of tests can be
utilized: Cell culture (it is the commercially obtained host cells that are
cultured, NOT the virus) A nasopharyngeal swab or aspirate or bronchial washings is submitted
Evidence of the presence of the virus is obtained by direct
observation of the cytopathic effects (CPE) of virus replication within the
infected culture cells This takes a LONG time Direct detection of viruses Look for characteristic enzymes that are produced by the virus (one
example is measurement of reverse transcriptase activity by
retroviruses) OR, electron microscopy can be utilized for those patient specimens
thought to contain very high concentrations of virus particles (think needle
in a haystack); this requires high technical proficiency, great expense, and
is not very specific to the virus particle OR, immuno-electron microscopy (IEM) is used, which involves coupling
specific antibodies to an electron-dense marker (colloidal gold) that is
easily visualized; if the viral antigen to the antibody is present in the
sample, it can be observed using electron microscopy (not all hospitals have
this technology) Serological methods (your basic antigen-antibody response; is either
direct or indirect) In direct methods, the lab uses specific antibodies to look for
virus-encoded proteins In indirect methods, patient serum or plasma is analyzed for the
presence of antibody Serological methods include haemagglutination/latex agglutination;
complement fixation; radioimmunoassays; immunofluorescence; ELISA;
radioimmune precipitation; and Western blot assays These techniques are sensitive, quantitative, and
FAST Nucleic Acid Based Methods include Northern and Southern blotting,
dot-blots, nucleotide sequence analysis, and polymerase chain reactions
(PCR) To summarize, there is always a trade-off when attempting to identify
viral etiologic agents. Time,
money, and clinical utility (just how many electron microscopes should a town
support?) must be considered. False
positives (classifying healthy persons as infected) and false negatives
(undetected cases) are very real issues.
Generally speaking, as sensitivity (the probability of testing positive
when the disease is truly present) increases, specificity (probability of
testing negative if the disease is truly absent)
decreases. Just how far should a clinician go in attempting to identify the cause of
a disease, especially if it appears to be viral in origin? You tell me. Take Home Thought There is more to this diagnosis business than meets
the eye.

Organism
Bacitracin
Susceptibility

Menu