Lab 11

Objectives:

Reading:

1. Bacteria of Oral Cavity and Respiratory Tract

1. Tortora, pages 397; 652; 659-662; 684

2. Demonstration of Viral Cultures

2. P: pages 73; 94-95; L: pages 38; 70

3. Rectal Specimens

 

Normal Skin Flora

 

Complete skin isolates lab:

1.      Review your MSA and blood culture subcultures.

2.      If you suspect S. aureus, perform a coagulase test:

a.      Obtain test tube containing a measured  0.5 ml of rabbit plasma.

b.      Using a sterilized inoculating loop, place a colony (or more) into this broth. 

c.      Incubate the test tube at 35-37 degrees. 

d.      At four hours examine for the presence of a clot (positive) and then re examine again at 24 hour if negative at 4 hours. (Lab assistants will remove the broth at 24 hours and refrigerate).

3.      MSA and blood culture subcultures are to be disposed of in tubs at this time.

 

Microorganisms of the Oral Cavity

 





A great diversity of organisms is found within the oral cavity. 

Here, at the entrance to both the digestive and respiratory systems, the environment is warm, moist, and nutrient-rich—-perfect for even the most fastidious of organisms.

 











Below is a list of the predominant flora of the oral cavity.  Most of these organisms are bacterial.  You should be familiar with the major organisms and their role in oral disease.

 

 

 

Table of the Microorganisms of the Oral Cavity

 

Microorganism

Gram Reaction

Oxygen Needs

Physiologic Traits

Association with Disease

Streptococcus salivarius

Positive

Facultative anaerobe

Coccus; a and g hemolysis; found on tongue surface; acid & levan production

Infectious endocarditis

Streptococcus sanguis

Positive

Facultative anaerobe

Coccus; acid production

Plaque flora; pulp infection; infectious endocarditis

Streptococcus mutans

Positive

Facultative anaerobe

Coccus; mostly on teeth; acid, levan, & dextran production

Infectious endocarditis

Lactobacillus acidophilus

Positive

Facultative anaerobe

Bacillus; acid tolerant; acid production

Plaque, caries

Lactobacillus casei

Positive

Facultative anaerobe

Bacillus; acid tolerant; acid production

Plaque, caries

Neisseria species

Negative

Aerobe

Diplococcus; oxidase positive

Normal flora

Actinomyces viscosus

Positive

Anaerobe

Bacillus; proteolytic; acid production

Actinomycosis; gingivitis

Actinomyces naeslundi

Positive

Anaerobe

Bacillus; mineralization; acid production

Periodontitis, caries

Bacteroides melanogenicus

Negative

Anaerobe

Bacillus; found in gingival pockets

Periodontitis; acute necrotizing ulcerative gingivitis (ANUG); subgingival plaque

Bacteroides oralis

Negative

Anaerobe

Bacillus; found in gingival pockets

Periodontitis; ANUG; subgingival plaque

Bacteroides forsythus

Negative

Anaerobe

Bacillus; found in gingival pockets

Periodontitis; ANUG; subgingival plaque

Bacteroides gingivalis

Negative

Anaerobe

Bacillus; found in gingival pockets

Periodontitis; ANUG; subgingival plaque

Fusobacterium nucleatum

Negative

Anaerobe

Acid production; toothpick-shaped rod

Chronic marginal periodontitis

Eikenella corrodens

Negative

Facultative anaerobe

Bacillus; colonies pit the agar

Systemic infection from bites or injury leading to cellulitis and arthritis

Treponema denticola

Not performed

Anaerobe

Spriochete; nutritionally fastidious

ANUG

Treponema vincenti

Not performed

Anaerobe

Spirochete; nutritionally fastidious

ANUG

Corynebacterium species

Positive

Variable

Bacillus; normal flora

Pulp and root canal infection

Porphyromonas gingivalis

Negative

Anaerobe

Bacillus

Periodontitis

Prevotella intermedia

Negative

Anaerobe

Bacillus

Predominant cause of ANUG

Actinobacillus actinomycetemcomitans

Negative

Facultative anaerobe

Bacillus; oxidase positive

Juvenile periodontitis

Candida albicans

Positve

Yeast

Normal flora

Thrush; denture stomatitis; root canal infection

 

The respiratory system can be divided into the upper and lower respiratory systems.

The upper respiratory system contains

·        the nose and its associated structures, which include ducts from the sinuses and nasolacrimal ducts from the tear-forming apparatus that empty into the nasal cavity

·        the pharynx (throat) and its associated structures, which include the middle ear and the eustachian tubes, and

·        the oral cavity, which contains the tongue.

The lower respiratory system contains

·        the larynx,

·        the trachea,

·        the bronchial tubes, and

·        the alveoli.

 

The lower respiratory system is essentially sterile, although the trachea may contain a few bacteria.  The upper respiratory system, on the other hand, is home to many normal flora, including some that are potentially pathogenic, given the right circumstances.

 

To a certain degree, the microorganisms of the upper respiratory system are a reflection of the microbiota of the skin.  For example, both Staphylococcus aureus and Staphylococcus epidermidis can be recovered from nasopharyngeal cultures.  Some organisms are more frequently found among certain age groups than others.  For example, Group A beta hemolytic Streptococcus is often carried by school age children.  Below is a list of some of the bacteria that can be isolated as normal flora from upper respiratory tract cultures:

·        Moraxella species

·        Neisseria species

·        S. epidermidis

 

The following organisms are only considered normal flora if present in very small numbers.  If present in large numbers, or if found in a pure culture, they are considered pathogenic:

·        S. aureus

·        Haemophilus influenzae

·        Other gram negative bacilli

 

Finally, below are examples of organisms that are generally always considered pathogenic:

·        Group A, beta hemolytic Streptococcus

·        Streptococcus pneumoniae

 

In today’s lab, we will compare your oral and respiratory cultures to known cultures of some common flora of the oral and upper respiratory areas.  Use the table on the next page to organize your pattern-recognition abilities and then to compare your isolates with the knowns. 

 

 

Remember, ‘colony configuration’ can include types of blood agar hemolysis, color of the colony, texture of the colony—in short, its physical appearance to your discerning eye.  ‘Colony margins’ include descriptive terms such as ‘smooth,’ ‘scalloped,’ ‘irregular,’ and ‘spreading.’  ‘Colony elevation’ is either ‘flat,’ ‘raised,’ or ‘grows below the agar line.’

 

Bacterial Colony

Colony Configuration

Colony Margins

Colony Elevation

Streptococcus sanguis

 

 

 

Streptococcus pneumoniae

 

 

 

Streptococcus pyogenes

 

 

 

Streptococcus agalactiae

 

 

 

S. epidermidis

 

 

 

S. aureus

 

 

 

 

Now, examine the blood agar plates of your oral samples from last week. 

1.      Compare the aerobic plate to the anaerobic plate.

a.      Is there any difference in growth patterns?

b.      Did the same organisms grow on both plates?

c.      What do these two plates tell you about the organisms’ oxygen requirements? 

2.      How many different colony types can you distinguish?

3.      How do your isolates compare to the above colony morphologies?

4.      Are your cultures pure or mixed?

5.      Perform a Gram stain of one oral colony of your choice (see next page for instructions).

 

Next, examine the blood agar plate of your respiratory sample from last week.  You will also want to refer to the Dichotomous Schemes below.

  1. Look for patterns of hemolysis among the colonies.
  2. Compare your normal flora to the table above.
  3. How many colony types do you see?
  4. Perform a Gram stain of one respiratory colony of your choice (see next page for instructions).
  5. If you have any Gram positive colonies that are beta hemolytic on blood agar, you will need to perform a catalase test to distinguish S. aureus from S. pyogenes.  Both of these organisms are beta hemolytic on blood agar.
  6. Any Gram negative diplococci should have an oxidase test performed (why?).
  7. Gram positive, catalase negative organisms may need to be further tested:
    1. If beta hemolytic:  Serodiagnostic test for Group A beta hemolytic Streptococcus OR subculture on blood agar and apply a BACITRACIN disk (see below for explanation).
    2. If alpha hemolytic:  subculture on blood agar and apply an OPTOCHIN disk (see below for explanation) to identify Streptococcus pneumoniae.



Gram Negative/Positive Dichotomous Schemes

 

 

 

 


Gram Stain

Materials:

Inoculating loop

Glass slide

Slide holder

Glass marking pen

Bunsen burner

Flint lighter

Bibulous paper

  1. Label your slide, if you plan on keeping it.

  2. Place a small drop of .85% saline on the slide.

  3. Sterilize your inoculating loop and select a colony.  Pick it up and mix it with the saline.

  4. Allow the saline/colony solution to dry fully.

  5. Heat fix it.

  6. Gram stain it:

    • Crystal violet, one minute. Rinse with water.

    • Iodine, one minute. Rinse with water.

    • Alcohol, until runoff is clear OR 20 seconds, whichever is shorter. Rinse with water.

    • Saffranin, one minute. Rinse with water.

  7. Blot dry, using bibulous paper.

  8. Coarse focus on 10x; fine focus, using oil, on 100 x.

 

 

Oxidase Test

To perform the oxidase test:

  1. Place an oxidase strip on a paper towel.

  2. Using a sterile inoculating needle, scrape part of your bacterial colony onto the oxidase strip.

  3. A blue/dark purple color change is positive.

 

Catalase Test

To perform a catalase test,

  1. Place a drop of hydrogen peroxide on a clean glass slide.

  2. Using a sterile inoculating needle, mix a selected colony with the peroxide.

  3. The presence of bubbles of oxygen is indicative of a positive reaction.

 

 

Bacitracin

Bacitracin is an antimicrobial.  That means it is a substance produced by a bacterium (in this case, by Bacillus subtilis) that inhibits other bacteria’s cell wall synthesis and disrupts their membrane structure. 

 

Disks impregnated with bacitracin are placed on blood agar plates containing Streptococcus.  After incubation, the following patterns can be observed:

 

Organism
Bacitracin Susceptibility

Group A Streptococcus

Sensitive

Group B Streptococcus

Resistant

Groups C, F, G Streptococcus

Resistant

 

The main purpose of this test is to presumptively identify Group A Streptococcus.

 

Optochin

This test is used to presumptively differentiate Streptococcus pneumoniae from other alpha hemolytic Streptococci.  Because S. pneumoniae is susceptible to extremely small concentrations of the antibiotic, optochin (unlike the other Streptococcus, which are susceptible only to larger amounts), a disk containing minute amounts of optochin is placed on a blood agar plate with presumptive S. pneumoniae.  After incubation, if there is a zone of inhibition that indicates susceptibility to optochin, S. pneumoniae are presumptively identified.

 


Rectal Samples

  1. A sterile swab of the rectal area will be made in the bathroom.

  2. Use the swab (in the bathroom) to streak the upper eighth of the following plates:

    • MacConkey’s

    • PEA

    • Hektoen

    • Blood agar

  3. BRING THE SWAB BACK TO THE LAB FOR DISPOSAL.

  4. At your lab station, use a sterile loop to streak for isolation.

  5. These plates will be examined next week.




Take Out Food for the Brain:

 

Although much attention is given to bacterial causes of respiratory tract diseases, the truth is that around 90% of acute upper respiratory infections and almost half of lower respiratory infections are caused by viruses.  One such virus is a Paramyxovirus called “respiratory syncitial virus (RSV),” named for the characteristic multi-nucleated syncitia that are formed when it grows in cell cultures.  A syncitium is a group of cells that have fused together.

 

Respiratory syncitial virus is the primary cause of viral respiratory disease in infants.  It infects and multiplies within the epithelial cells of the upper respiratory tract, generally producing a mild, even unnoticeable illness.  However, in a certain number of infants, it will subsequently spread into the lower respiratory tract, where it can wreak havoc.  Here, bronchitis, croup, and pneumonia can develop; symptoms are so severe that death can occur rapidly.  RSV is highly contagious and is known for sweeping through hospital nurseries.  It kills 4500 infants each year in the United States and has been associated with Sudden Infant Death Syndrome (SIDS) and the development of asthma in its survivors. 

 

Because viral identification methods are time-consuming and expensive, the reported figures probably underestimate the true number of cases.  Viruses, unlike bacteria, do not grow on artificial media such as agar.  They require living cells in which to reproduce.    And, because the identification of a viral etiologic cause of disease is often academic (it generally makes no difference as far as therapeutic interventions go), patients are presumptively diagnosed with viral infections after bacterial causes have been ruled out.  Koch’s postulates do not prevail here!


To conclusively identify a virus such as RSV, a number of tests can be utilized:

  • Cell culture (it is the commercially obtained host cells that are cultured, NOT the virus)

    • A nasopharyngeal swab or aspirate or bronchial washings is submitted

    • Evidence of the presence of the virus is obtained by direct observation of the cytopathic effects (CPE) of virus replication within the infected culture cells

    • This takes a LONG time

  • Direct detection of viruses

    • Look for characteristic enzymes that are produced by the virus (one example is measurement of reverse transcriptase activity by retroviruses)

    • OR, electron microscopy can be utilized for those patient specimens thought to contain very high concentrations of virus particles (think needle in a haystack); this requires high technical proficiency, great expense, and is not very specific to the virus particle

    • OR, immuno-electron microscopy (IEM) is used, which involves coupling specific antibodies to an electron-dense marker (colloidal gold) that is easily visualized; if the viral antigen to the antibody is present in the sample, it can be observed using electron microscopy (not all hospitals have this technology)

  • Serological methods (your basic antigen-antibody response; is either direct or indirect)

    • In direct methods, the lab uses specific antibodies to look for virus-encoded proteins

    • In indirect methods, patient serum or plasma is analyzed for the presence of antibody

    • Serological methods include haemagglutination/latex agglutination; complement fixation; radioimmunoassays; immunofluorescence; ELISA; radioimmune precipitation; and Western blot assays

    • These techniques are sensitive, quantitative, and FAST

  • Nucleic Acid Based Methods include Northern and Southern blotting, dot-blots, nucleotide sequence analysis, and polymerase chain reactions (PCR)

 

To summarize, there is always a trade-off when attempting to identify viral etiologic agents.  Time, money, and clinical utility (just how many electron microscopes should a town support?) must be considered.  False positives (classifying healthy persons as infected) and false negatives (undetected cases) are very real issues.  Generally speaking, as sensitivity (the probability of testing positive when the disease is truly present) increases, specificity (probability of testing negative if the disease is truly absent) decreases.

 

Just how far should a clinician go in attempting to identify the cause of a disease, especially if it appears to be viral in origin?  You tell me.


 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 



Take Home Thought

There is more to this diagnosis business than meets the eye.



Menu