|
Objectives: |
Reading: |
|
1. Disinfection: Time, Concentration and Gram Reaction |
1. Handouts |
Time, Concentration, and Gram Reaction
Which variables contribute to the selection of a disinfectant and its ability to eliminate pathogens?
Today's lab will focus on the relationship of contact time, disinfectant concentration, and Gram reaction.
There are two parts to the lab, and each part is performed using both a Gram negative and a Gram positive bacterial broth culture.
The disinfectants to be used include:
Test of Effect of Concentration of Disinfectant on Anti-Microbial Capabilities:
Materials:
Broth culture containing Staphylococcus epidermidis
Broth culture containing Escherichia coli
One tube of undiluted disinfectant
Three tubes of nutrient broth, each containing 2.7 mL of nutrient broth
Two tubes of nutrient broth for positive and negative controls
Wax pencil
Pipette
Instructions:

Test of Effect of Contact Time of Disinfectant on Anti-Microbial Capabilities:
Materials:
Broth culture containing Staphylococcus epidermidis
Broth culture containing Escherichia coli
One tube of disinfectant at recommended concentration
Three petri dishes
Wax pencil
Inoculating loop
Bunsen burner
Instructions:

The following week, you will determine whether growth occurred in your broths and plates. Based on what you observe, you will be able to determine three things:
Take Out Food for the Brain:
The use of antibiotics is reported to lead to bacterial resistance to antibiotics. This is a challenging statement that should give any conscientious health care worker pause.
Case in point:
Staphylococcus bacteria are transmitted by skin to skin contact. When they gain access into the body through open wounds, they can become pathogenic. Staphylococcus aureus infect the skin, soft tissue, bones, and joints. According to the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC), these infections are responsible for 13% of the over two million annual nosocomial infections in the United States.
Until very recently, all methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA), the most resistant of the Staphylococcal pathogens, were known to be sensitive to vancomycin. Vancomycin is bactericidal against many gram-positive and some gram-negative cocci. However, it is toxic and should be used with caution, especially among patients whose renal function is insufficient. Consequently, vancomycin is considered to be a drug of last resort, and blood levels are frequently monitored in order to prevent potential toxic effects.
In April, 1999, the CDC received the news that all epidemiologists had been expecting but hoping was still a long way in coming: the first confirmed death of a patient with MRSA in her heart valves whose infection did not respond to vancomycin. The following November, three people were reported to have died in Hong Kong from a similar strain.
Although researchers are hard at work in their efforts to develop new antibiotics, at the present time, there is no available antibiotic that can eliminate MRSA that are also resistant to vancomycin.
Is it irresponsible and alarmist of medical experts to declare that the use of antibiotics actually leads to bacterial resistance to antibiotics? You tell me.
Take Home Thought
WHAT DOESN'T KILL THEM MAKES THEM STRONGER