Lab 9

 

 

Objectives:

Reading:

1. Antibiotic Susceptibility & MIC

1. Tortora, Pages 549-550

2. Skin Specimen

2. P: page 127; L: pages 93-94

3. Handout


 

 

Antimicrobial Susceptibility Testing

 

When a microorganism has been isolated from a patient specimen, the obvious question is ‘how can we eliminate this organism’?  The goal of antimicrobial susceptibility testing is to predict the success or failure of antibiotic therapy in the patient. 

 

‘In the patient’ is considered an in vivo (living) situation.  Unfortunately, all tests are performed in vitro (literally ‘in glass tubes,’ it means outside of the patient).  Consequently, results should be viewed in the context of the patient’s clinical information and prior clinician experience with the selected antimicrobial.

 

All antimicrobial susceptibility testing is performed under standardized test conditions.  The results must be reproducible.  This means that, regardless of who performs the test, which lab the test is performed in, the circumstances surrounding the test performance, or any other variable, the test results will always be the same for that particular sample.

 

Today we will look at two types of antimicrobial susceptibility testing, the Kirby-Bauer disc diffusion test and the minimal inhibitory concentration test.

 

Kirby-Bauer Test

 

A large agar plate is inoculated uniformly with a standardized amount of bacteria.   ‘Uniformly’ means that there is an equal amount of bacteria throughout the entire plate.  Some people call this a “lawn.”  ‘Standardized’ means that there are policies and procedures in place that have been accepted by microbiologists throughout the world as to the exact quantity of bacteria that is to be used for the inoculum.  This quantity is consistently adhered to.

 

Following this, small filter paper disks (about 6 mm in diameter), each of which has been impregnated with a standard amount of antibiotic, are placed onto the agar plate.

The plate is incubated.  During incubation, the chemotherapeutic agents diffuse from the disks into the agar.  The concentration of the agent is greatest, of course, closest to the disk and least at the furthest distance from the disk.

 

Once incubation is completed, microbiologists measure zones of inhibition, in mm, as an indicator of the effectiveness of the agent.  A zone of inhibition is a circular area radiating from the disk in which growth of the microorganism has been completely inhibited.  The diameter of this zone is measured and then compared to a standard table in order to correctly interpret the results.

 

Antimicrobial susceptibility of the microorganism is defined as the organism either being sensitive, intermediate, or resistant to the chemotherapeutic agent.

 

 

 


 















































 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 


To read a zone of inhibition for a particular antimicrobial, a metric ruler is used.  The ruler, above, is divided into 20 centimeters.  Each centimeter is equal to 10 millimeters.  Zones of inhibition are measured in millimeters.  Do not confuse the centimeter numbers with the millimeter markings. 

 

To make a reading,

 

Kirby-Bauer Antibiotic Agar Diffusion Test and Broth Dilution Test Results Table

 

Antibiotic

(Abreviation)

Escherichia

coli

Staphylococcus

epidermidis

Enterococcus

faecalis

Pseudomonas aeruginosa

Klebsiella

pneumoniae

Serratia

marcesens

 

DM

SIR

DM

SIR

DM

SIR

DM

SIR

DM

SIR

DM

SIR

Amoxicillin/Clavulinic

Acid (AMC)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Ampicillin (AM)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Carbenicillin (CB)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Cefoxitin (FOX)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Cephalothin (CR)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Chloramphenicol (C)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Gentamicin (GM)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Imipenem (IPM)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Moxalactam (MOX)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Penicillin (P)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Sulfoxasole (G)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Vancomycin (VA)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Ampicillin Broth

Dilution (MIC)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Zone Diameter Interpretive Chart Based on Data Provided by the

National Committee for Clinical Laboratory Standards (NCCLS)

 

Antimicrobial

Agent

 

Code

Disc

Potency

Zone Diameter Interpretive Standards (mm)

Resistant

Intermediate

Susceptible

Chloramphenicol

(for non-Haemo-philus sp.)

 

C-30

 

30  mg

 

<12 mm

 

13-17 mm

 

>/= 18 mm

Penicillin (for

staphylococci)

 

P-10

 

10 U

 

</= 28 mm

 

 

 

>/= 29 mm

Penicillin (for

enterococci)

 

P-10

 

10 U

 

</= 14 mm

 

 

 

>/= 15 mm

Penicillin (for

enterococcal

streptococci)

 

P-10

 

10 U

 

</=19 mm

 

20-27 mm

 

>/= 28 mm

Streptomycin

S-10

10 mg

</= 11 mm

12-14 mm

>/= 15 mm

Tetracycline (for

most organisms)

 

TE-30

 

30  mg

 

</= 14 mm

 

15-18 mm

 

>/= 19 mm

Trimethoprim

TMP-5

5 mg

</= 10 mm

11-15 mm

>/= 16 mm

Amoxicillin/

Clavulinic Acid for

staphylococci

 

 

 

 

<19 mm

 

 

 

>20 mm

Amoxicillin/

Clavulinic Acid for

all others

 

 

 

<13 mm

 

14-17 mm

 

>18 mm

Imipenem

 

 

<13 mm

14-15 mm

>16 mm

Moxalactam

 

 

<14 mm

15-22 mm

>23 mm

 

Minimum Inhibitory Concentration

 

The minimum inhibitory concentration, better known as the MIC, is the lowest concentration of an antimicrobial that visibly inhibits bacterial growth in a given time period.  It differs from the Kirby-Bauer method in that it provides the clinician with a quantitative value, rather than a qualitative value.

 

To determine the MIC for a particular antimicrobial,

 

In today’s lab, we will compare one antimicrobial, ampicillin, using the MIC and the Kirby-Bauer methods.  The amipicillin was serially diluted out, from an original concentration of 64 mg/mL to a final concentration of 0.125 mg/mL, using twofold dilutions.

 

On the chart on the previous page, note the minimum dilution of the ampicillin at which growth of each microorganism was visibly inhibited.

 

 

Normal Skin Flora

 

Human skin is home to literally billions of microorganisms.  Most are Gram positive bacteria that thrive on sebum and sweat.  Sebum, a product of the sebaceous glands,

and sweat provide nutrients and moisture.  When these bacteria break down the sebum, the product, fatty acids, is inhibitory to most Gram negative bacteria.  In addition to Gram positive bacteria, some fungi and viruses may be found on skin.

 

In today’s lab, we will take skin samples (from ourselves) and streak them onto mannitol salt agar (MSA) and blood agar.  Recall that blood agar is both basic and differential, whereas MSA is selective for halophiles such as Staphylococcus, which is Gram positive.

 

To take a skin culture, roll a moistened sterile swab over the skin site that you wish to investigate.  Then roll the swab across the MSA and blood agar plates.  We will examine the cultures next week (and sub-culture as necessary).

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Take Out Food for the Brain:

 

“Flesh-eating bacteria” have been in the news recently.  Is this a new group of bacteria?  The answer is old group, but more virulent strain.  Necrotizing fasciitis, as this disease is known within the medical field, is caused by Streptococcus pyogenes.  S. pyogenes is implicated in a variety of human diseases, including strep throat, scarlet fever, and various skin conditions.  Most infections of the skin that are caused by S. pyogenes are usually secondary to a primary lesion caused by another organism.

 

With necrotizing fasciitis (literally ‘dying, inflamed soft tissue’), there may be some minor trauma.  Some cases occur following surgery, especially abdominal surgery.  However, there are cases where there is no noticeable injury to the skin. 

 

The bacteria attack the subcutaneous tissue (the soft tissue under the skin), which rapidly becomes gangrenous.  The infection can actually be observed to move, and tissue destruction is known to occur at the rate of two inches per hour.  Once the tissue has died, it must be removed.  If caught early, removal of flesh, subcutaneous tissue, and some fat may halt the spread of the disease (along with antimicrobial therapy).  However, limb amputation is often required, and victims may succumb to respiratory failure, heart failure, or renal failure due to the necrotizing toxin’s effects. 

 

The necrotizing toxin is thought to be a streptococcal erythrogenic pyrogenic toxin (SPE).  ‘Erythrogenic’ means the toxin causes a reddening (of the tissues involved), and ‘pyrogenic’ means the toxin induces fever production.  This is an example of an exotoxin.  Recall the origin of exotoxins is from bacteriophages, viruses that infect bacteria. 

 

Where does this particular strain of bacteria come from?  Anywhere that Streptococcus pyogenes are found.  S. pyogenes are not normal skin flora, but they are present in the environment and can enter through an abrasion, a puncture wound, or a cut. 

 

Three conditions are thought to be necessary for necrotizing fasciitis to occur:

 

Why might the human immune response be unable to respond to the threat of S. pyogenes?  You tell me.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Leg infected with S. pyogenes,

 resulting in necrotizing fasciitis.

 

 

 

 

Take Home Thought

Things aren’t always what they seem to be.  Sometimes they are much worse.

 















Menu