Teacher Effectiveness and Teacher Impact on P-12 Student Learning (CAEP Accountability Measure 1)
*NOTE: Effective Fall 2023, EPPs will no longer receive complete reports from the IDOE on this measure. USI is currently working toward implementing new instruments to measure Teacher effectiveness and impact to supplement this reporting requirement.
Indiana legislation (IC20-28-11.5-9) requires each school corporation/district to provide the disaggregated results of staff performance evaluations annually to the Indiana Department of Education (IDOE). It is important to note that school corporations/districts may develop local evaluation instruments and therefore a variety of instruments is used across the state. However, the legislation does mandate inclusion of specific types of measures. Of particular interest to the University of Southern Indiana is the requirement that locally developed instruments must include objective measures of student achievement and growth in both tested and non-tested areas. Additionally, the instruments must include rigorous measures of effectiveness, including observations and other performance indicators. Therefore, the positive evaluation results of program completers provide evidence that completers positively impact P-12 student learning and that completers effectively apply the professional knowledge, skills, and dispositions that the preparation experiences were designed to achieve. Evaluation results for first, second, and third year teachers are linked to the teacher preparation institution which provided their training. This information is also available on the Indiana Department of Education website: https://www.in.gov/doe/educators/epps/educator-preparation-program-comparative-data-and-performance-data/
|
Report Year |
Data collection year |
Percent of USI completers who were rated as effective or highly effective |
Percent of Indiana completers who were rated as effective or highly effective |
|
Fall 2022 |
2020-2021 |
98% (n=179) |
95% (n=3560) |
|
Fall 2021 |
2019-2020 |
97% (n=214) |
98% (n=4671) |
|
Fall 2020 |
2018-2019 |
99% (n=252) |
98% (n=4596) |
|
Fall 2019 |
2017-2018 |
96% (n=253) |
96% (n= 5566) |
|
Fall 2018 |
2016-2017 |
97% (n=275) |
95% (n=9172) |
Click the file titles below for more details.
- Fall 2022 Teacher Effectiveness Data
- Fall 2021 Teacher Effectiveness Data
- Fall 2020 Teacher Effectiveness Data
- Fall 2019 Teacher Effectiveness Data
- Fall 2018 Teacher Effectiveness Data
USI Partner School Corporation Teacher Effectiveness Data
One school corporation that employs a substantial number of USI program completers shares new teacher performance evaluation summary data with USI. New teachers are defined as teachers with three (3) or less years of experience. The corporation disaggregates the data and provides summary data only to USI.
|
Percent of USI-Prepared New Teachers Rated Effective or Highly Effective |
||||||
|
School Year |
Number of Teachers |
Final Score |
Domain 1 Instructional Design & Assessment |
Domain 2 Instructional Delivery |
Domain 3 Learning Environment |
Domain 4 Collaboration & Professional Responsibility |
|
2021-2022 |
USI 619 |
94% |
96% |
91% |
94% |
97% |
|
|
Non-USI |
96% |
93% |
88% |
94% |
93% |
|
|
USI Mean Score |
3.27 |
3.23 |
3.15 |
3.53 |
3.46 |
|
|
Non-USI Mean Score |
3.27 |
3.22 |
3.16 |
3.49 |
3.48 |
|
2020-2021 |
USI 591 |
97% |
94% |
88% |
96% |
96% |
|
|
Non-USI |
96% |
96% |
88% |
91% |
95% |
|
|
USI Mean Score |
3.31 |
3.26 |
3.18 |
3.60 |
3.52 |
|
|
Non-USI Mean Score |
3.29 |
3.25 |
3.18 |
3.50 |
3.51 |
|
2019-2020 |
USI 589 |
96% |
91% |
87% |
92% |
100% |
|
|
Non-USI 755 |
92% |
90% |
85% |
88% |
96% |
|
|
USI Mean Score |
3.40 |
3.34 |
3.25 |
3.72 |
3.66 |
|
|
Non-USI Mean Score |
3.39 |
3.31 |
3.26 |
3.62 |
3.65 |
|
2018-2019 |
USI 491 |
93% |
91% |
91% |
95% |
98% |
|
|
Non-USI 891 |
97% |
95% |
93% |
96% |
97% |
|
|
USI - Mean Score |
3.49 |
3.38 |
3.29 |
3.70 |
3.81 |
|
|
Non-USI Mean Score |
3.52 |
3.37 |
3.37 |
3.72 |
3.75 |